The Greatest Man in Cedar Hole – Stephanie Doyon
Good writing. Evocative prose. Fabulous characters. Vivid imagination. And yet, and yet … this was an “almost” book to me, that is to say that it was a good book, but it just missed being a really good book.
Cedar Hole is a nothing little town in which people are comfortable in its mediocrity. The most unique thing is that grass grows really fast and people are always having to mow their lawns. So mowing lawns has been elevated into an art form; the annual fair features a lawnmowing contest and boys vie every year for the honor of winning.
Enter two boys. Francis Pinkham is the very soul of mediocrity. Afraid to assert himself as the result of being the only boy in a family of, frankly, insane sisters, he lumbers along with occasional flashes of grace. Then there’s Robert J. Cutler, a smarmy little kissass who is even more irritating because he’s sincere. Robert wins the contest several years in a row until he’s finally beaten by Francis, but Robert still gets the medal because he mowed in the shape of a star. So there we are: two boys pitted against each other in a race for the title of the greatest man in Cedar Hole.
Then time passes in a blur. Robert’s father leaves town, abandoning Robert and his mother. He never leaves. Eventually he marries and dies young, leaving a bitter wife and a yearning daughter. Francis, on the other hand, marries his high school sweetheart and continues down the path of mediocrity–that is until his sons discover well water and, with the help of a swindler, bottle it to make money. I found myself lost in the comparison between the two males and the time that passes all too quickly from boyhood to manhood. I kind of lost interest, but made myself finish. And I was glad that I did because the novel ends on a poignant note about Francis and his decisions about what honor means.
So what made this an “almost” book? I have to ask why the author insisted on the overt comparison between Robert and Francis. It dictates a structure that is never truly realized, one that would be better if it were inferred rather than stated. It’s a shame because Doyers has a vivid imagination and some of the more compelling characters that I’ve encountered between the pages of a novel. Indeed, it reminded me of John Irving in his early days before he started spiralling downard with the incomprehensible Son of the Circus (and yes, his latest is in my new pile).
So, yes, recommend, but not unconditionally. If it attacks you from the library shelves, go for it; there are worse ways to spend a few hours. But don’t actively seek it out.