All this post debate nattering

All this post debate nattering

Let me first say that Youtube is a wonderful wonderful thing, and I have wasted far too much time in the past couple of weeks watching past debates–starting with Carter/Reagan. It’s really interesting to see how the debates have evolved over time. Is it my imagination, or have the questions gotten dumbed down in the past 30 years?

And is it just me, or is all this post debate “analysis” just ridiculously silly? Before we closed out the CNN window, I think I actually heard someone say, “Well, Obama may need to think about his debate style. He tries to put things in context too much.”

Oh, the horror. Context and rational thought? How will we ever survive?

And perhaps more to the point, I’m not sure how all these people are coming up with a verdict of “Romney crushed it.” Crushed what, pray tell? Because I thought he was as insincere, dishonest, flipfloppy, and smarmy as ever.

Comments are closed.
Parma endorion essays on middle-earth map
Margo roth spiegelman writing a business
Citing newspaper articles turabian style manual
Dinig sana kita synthesis meaning
Vendita case sieci pontassieve train
Ey advisory writing assessment prompts
Daynor chemical company case study
Application of transition metal catalysts in organic synthesis pdf
Punch bareknuckle belicoso review journal newspaper
Gav ram charan review journal newspaper